The COVID-19 Power Grab as “Organized Crime”

by Prof. Anthony J. Hall | Sep 7, 2022

Many holes are busting through the thick mental wall of media-generated obstructions meant to block wide public understanding of the COVID-19 power grab. The fake fight to vanquish the celebrity coronavirus is being widely exposed as a multi-faceted deception.

As delusions are shattering, more and more people are starting to open their minds to the profound nature of the actual dangers engulfing us.  In the process the dons directing the COVID Mafioso are losing control of the dominant COVID narrative. The narrative’s embattled defenders are becoming increasingly desperate to divert public attention away from the scene of the COVID crimes.      

In spite of the diversionary tactics, a growing constituency is coming to see that human predators, not the surprise invasion of some new type of germ, are the primary culprits driving the malaise that has been overtaking us. Our economy, our rights, our freedoms, our institutions, and increasingly our very lives and wellbeing are under attack as the COVID-19 power grab moves into new frontiers of subversive infiltration.

Some of those engaged in the grab for power have exposed their true agenda by celebrating the crash of existing forms of political economy. They have lauded the destruction of our life support systems as a necessary expedient to clear decks for massive structural transformation sometimes described as the Great Reset. See this.

This slogan is best understood as a cynical PR phrase whose propagandistic purpose is to disguise the lawless ruthlessness of the COVID-19 power grab. In their internally contradictory fantasies the Davos devotees pushing the idea of a Great Reset, picture a woke and green utopia under the digitally-enabled iron fist of corporatist dictatorship.

To anticipate where this power grab is taking us, we need only evaluate the trajectory of developments delivered to us since 2020. The weight of evidence has become overwhelming that the COVID measures imposed in the name of safeguarding human health are doing precisely the opposite. The COVID lockdowns accelerated a well-advanced economic calamity and the injections have set in motion a massive global public health catastrophe still in its infancy.

 See this.

COVID jabs, the primary supposed remedy for the misnamed pandemic, have so far been shot into the arms of well over half of the world’s 8 billion inhabitants.  As imperfect and incomplete as it is, the evidence points to the now-inescapable conclusion that these injections are making a very high proportion of jab recipients sicker rather than better. The jabs are truncating lifespans, not prolonged them.

Moreover all those who have taken the shots are made more vulnerable to the full array of infectious diseases including COVID-19. The COVID jabs are surreptitiously destroying human immunity, a process of biological sabotage that becomes more and more severe with repeated injections.

The aim of this assault on natural immunity is to advance the conditions for a permanent and universally mandated regime of cradle-to-grave injections. The wonders of natural immunity are being stripped from humans as part of a broader assault design to render most people more dependent on our overlords for our very survival.

Promoting the Industrial Re-engineering of Human Biology

The World Health Organization played a significant role in this coordinated attack on innate immunity through its strategic redefinition of “herd immunity.” Before October of 2020 the WHO acknowledged that populations can reach collective immunity—herd immunity– by widespread “natural immunity developed through previous infection.” Then the WHO proclaimed that herd immunity can only be attained only when a “threshold of vaccination is reached.” See this.

This WHO pronouncement promoted the inaccurate claim that vaccine-induced immunity is more effective than natural immunity. The main health division of the United Nations thereby sanctioned what amounted to an industrial takeover of the core mechanisms governing human interactions with disease.

This change helped to clear the way for the global push to universalize COVID-19 injections, an unprecedented campaign that we can now see in retrospect as the thin edge of the wedge in the technocratic takeover of bodily autonomy. So far there has been almost no space afforded by governments or the media for open public discussion and democratic due process on the corporate implementation of this transhumanist agenda.

We the human guinea pigs inducted into unregulated bouts of nonconsensual medical experimentation have not been dealt in to the decision-making process on how our own bodies are to be invaded, reconstituted, and controlled. If it has already been decided by our masters that even our very persons no longer belong to us, what else can we expect from the next stages of the “Great Reset”?

The COVID injections have provided the main point of entry enabling the surveillance state to penetrate under people’s skin as part of the industrial re-engineering of human biology. This ongoing engineering project extends to the continuation of the imperial quest for total information awareness and control, including over the digital flow of cashless money. Many of our upper echelon governors want to further empower themselves by making cashless money systems tied to social credit scoring the basis for AI control of all financial transactions.     

Accordingly, the imposition of the biggest injection campaign in history aimed at inoculating the entire population of the world is anything but safe and humanitarian. Rather, this campaign is a key element in a determined grab for power pressed forward on the basis of an enormous fraud. Instead of offering protection, the toxic jabs are ruining and snuffing out lives in what is proving to be by far the biggest medical scandal of all times.

See this.

In the face of these developments, the guardians of the COVID myths continue to try to expunge and hide as much of the evidence as they can of injection deaths and injuries. The determination continues that nothing must be allowed to call into question the sunny ways fairy tale that the COVID injections are safe and effective.

Honest Mistakes or Malicious Intent?  

The rapid exposure suggesting the immense scale of the COVID fraud is happening in clear view of the many millions of people who have learned to steer around the lockstep deceptions of the now-discredited regime media. The truth seekers have been feeding and absorbing this rush of disclosure. They have developed skills in critical and independent thinking, sufficient to recognize sources of generally reliable COVID-related information.

Those capable of making the necessary distinctions between credible and fraudulent sources, however, still remain a minority.  Will this minority group now grow into a majority as more and more people lose loved ones or look on as the medical system denies proper recognition, empathy and treatment to family members who well understand they have been severely injured by the jabs?

How much more lying and severe abuse, including acts of premeditated murder, can members of the public withstand before they become outraged enough to demand some measure of accountability from COVID Officialdom?  

What will happen to those who until now have trusted authorities in government and the media to guide them through the supposed remedies promoted as if they have the capacity to ease and end the claimed COVID inflictions? Will the scale and intensity of new revelations about the grave harm being done in the name of fighting COVID, continue to push global public opinion in a positive direction? 

Will those who have so far trusted in the guidance of authority figures overseeing the COVID fiasco find the gumption to put their gullibility aside and start asking some pertinent skeptical questions?

Can majority opinion be stretched enough to embrace the realization that we are in the midst of a monumental power grab misrepresented as an evidence-based response to a medical emergency? Will public awareness develop to the point where a vigilant, aroused and well-informed citizenry can bring forward demands backed by the weight of solid public opinion?

The heart of these demands must call on public officials to put together credible teams of objective investigators with the background to knowledgeably explore many unanswered questions. A number of these most vital questions have been brought to light by conscientious whistleblowers who often have faced severe recriminations for pointing out the lies and crimes of COVID Officialdom.

As with the case of the “medical jails” set up for COVID patients at, for instance, the Amita Health Resurrection Center in Chicago, the leads uncovered by whistle blowers like Dr. Elizabeth Vliet are often extremely significant. They must be followed up by the work of professional investigators armed with extensive subpoena powers. If properly done, many of the investigations will have to give way to criminal charges pressed against some of the worst COVID culprits.

Before society as a whole begins to come to terms with major revelations of COVID wrongdoing now captured on the public record, many more people will have to critically examine their own assumptions about what went wrong. It is natural to first assume, for instance, that any failure to respond appropriately to the vagaries of the COVID debacle must be inadvertent— an outcome of say honest mistakes, simple misunderstandings, or maybe even unfortunate incompetence.

There can be no doubt that incompetence, stupidity and the naïve complicity of some officials have played a role in the genesis of the COVID debacle. Any assumption, however, that this explanation is sufficient in itself to explain the depth of our current dilemma is simply wrong.

So too is the tendency to explain away the genuinely criminal nature of the COVID operation with the view that all the professional people involved were simply doing their best to respond to a daunting set of uncharted and unprecedented circumstances. Many of these “unprecedented circumstances,” however, can now be shown to be carefully planned and implemented.

Such shallow and incomplete assessments about the nature of the COVID-19 power grab will only leave society more vulnerable to even more audacious crimes to come. The ongoing hunt by multi-billionaires and their accomplices for added spoils is best achieved by implementing methods of more complete control.

Dr. Michael Yeadon has reflected on the difficulty now and in the past that people have had in taking action to block the rise of ruthless regimes whose leaders seem intent on causing great harm. He has written,

“Many have asked why people didn’t resist tyrants in the past. Partly it is fear. But it’s more than that. It’s that normal people, like you and me, simply cannot imagine being so evil. We trust in humanity. And so we should. Most people are good. Few are truly terrifyingly horrible. But some are. It’s the inability to believe it’s happening that really stopped people objecting when they should, when the evidence was unmistakable but had not yet quite reached their door, their family.”

 A good way to move towards more proactive engagement with menacing developments is to avoid overdependence on assumptions. To transcend the realm of assumption one must ask questions, plenty of questions, directed especially at those claiming special imperatives to educate the public from positions of well-rewarded authority. 

Those who fall into the danger zones where unsupported assumptions prevail are often the victims of groupthink. In this COVID-19 power grab, groupthink is often promoted by the lockstep decisions of those directing many media venues.

Since the debacle began in 2020, media people have been leading human lambs to receive their jabs on the sacrificial altars of the TV religion preaching redemption from COVID infection. Medical practitioners have performed their assigned role in the ritualized killing, injury and obliteration of the natural immunity of those put under the needle of invasive spike protein replication.

Breaking Social Cohesion by Pushing the Idea We Are All Biohazards to One Another  

How is it that the governments of the vast majority of the world’s 195 countries have all made essentially the same set of errors in reacting to the same set of circumstances? The replication of the same set of wrong responses to the manufactured COVID crisis began almost immediately.

The decisive move came with the unprecedented decision to follow China’s lead in shutting down global society’s life’s blood of free movement and circulation. The new obstructions put in place extended in many directions, including to the strangulation of targeted aspects of commerce and work.

The lockdowns were constructed with an eye to putting up particularly high obstacles to transactions supporting small business, the middle class, and the independence of working people. The lockdowns enormously accelerated the suck up of assets from the largest mass of humanity to a tiny contingent of wealthy people far above the top 1 %.

Especially hard hit were about a billion and a half workers in low-income countries where informal employment is most common.

See this.

The lockdowns promoted the view that even healthy people are potential biohazards to one another; that everyone has cause to picture everyone else as suspects to be spurned, distrusted and subjected to many forms of distancing. This shattering of social cohesion helped along imperial strategies of divide-and-conquer.

The quick and uniform implementation of such an invasive assertion of state power indicates that some global authority was the common source of the directives to national governments. What global authority would be in a position to impose through compulsion a conformist policy on most national systems of public health throughout the world?

Certainly the WEF played an important role. But the WEF takes its orders ultimately from those in charge of global corporations and the bankers that facilitate their operations. Only international banking institutions and their corporate proxies, including BlackRock and Vanguard, would be in a position to compel such uniform and consistent responses from almost all national governments.

The terrible implications of this formidable display of geopolitical muscle-flexing must be resolutely faced. More than that, the existing kleptocracy that forms the dominant financial system must be remade to effectively serve all of humanity, not just a minute minority within it.  The required changes point in a very different direction than the Great Reset advocated by the WEF and its most annoying mascot and flunky, Justin Trudeau.

Trudeau’s dilettantish quest to extend “post-nationalist” governance is representative of larger forces pointing humanity towards mass enslavement. Trudeau personifies an emerging class of hucksters trying to replicate the example of the “philanthropic” crime boss, Bill Gates.

Only by building up financial expressions of national self-governance can we the peoples of the world escape further entrapment in the COVID-19 power grab and in all the other manufactured crises being made to flow from it.

The stimulation of fear and confusion over everything from moneypox to widespread famine is helping to hold back some careful investigation of who and what is behind COVID-19 power grab. Rather than allowing ourselves to be distracted by more rounds of manufactured fear, we need to stand our ground. We must demand formal means of investigating the evidence of organized criminality facilitating the manufactured COVID crisis whose devastating outcomes continue to unfold. See this.

From Cutting Carbon Footprints to the Eliminating Masses of People

The Paris agreement on climate change transacted in 2015 can be pictured as a prelude to the adoption of near-identical policies by nearly all national governments in responding to the supposedly new coronavirus.

Within hours of being sworn into office in January of 2021, US President Joe Biden authorized the US adhesion to the Paris agreement.

The World Economic Forum was a major player drawing the governments of all the world’s countries into the Paris agreement. For those who imbibe the Kool-Aid of the WEF, the goal of reducing and even eliminating the “carbon footprint” of people starts with the quest to decarbonize all energy production.

From there it goes to conceiving of people as cancers to be eliminated. In the minds of the world’s most highly entitled virtue signalers, the global population is composed of human herds to be culled and reduced in making a greener and more healthy world.

The COVID-19 power grab and its expression in the Great Reset are meant to reduce humanity’s overall carbon footprint. In fact the injection program seems well calculated to cancel out every type of footprint of those humans eliminated in the waging of a secular yet holy war to conquer sickness, overpopulation, and global warming.

The anti-carbon, anti-human preoccupations of the puppet regimes dominating the Western governments are taking the form of unprecedented interventions to slow the pace and shrink the scale of economic activity. The key means of making this contraction happen are to make food and fossil fuels more scarce and expensive. See this.

The goal of imposing brakes on economic activity constitutes a virtual death sentence whose first victims are millions of poor people. This initiative is being pushed by the same people who are putting pressure on Zioamerican-led NATO to engage in military conflict with Russia and China.

The promotion of simultaneous acts of war, one targeting those on the home front and the other aimed at provoking the hostility of nuclear-armed superpowers, is both bizarre and reckless to say the least. One could interpret this convergence of unfolding scenarios as one well calculated to accelerate the mass elimination of people.  

Operational and Conceptual Deceits in the COVID Lies

Dr. Michael Yeadon originally perceived the medical mess being made of misnamed pandemic as the result of a series of serious mistakes. Gradually he moved away from this view. Dr. Yeadon has put on the public record a very rich account of his changing perceptions of COVID Officialdom. See this.

As the futility of his quest to help out the cause of medical sanity became increasingly clear to him, Dr. Yeadon gradually embraced the view that the COVID-19 debacle is no accident that happened randomly. Rather it is his professional conclusion that the whole fiasco is the outcome of a sinister plan to purposely inflict harm.

In going through this analytic transition, Dr. Yeadon has rendered explicit the views of many who are making similar shifts of understanding. Dr. Yeadon is speaking for a wider circle of participants and witnesses in concluding that it is maliciousness, not incompetence, that is the primary driving force of the COVID fiasco.

Dr. Yeadon brings to his interpretation a wealth of experience and achievement in the process of Research and Development in the creation of commercial drugs. He is a former VP of Pfizer where he was the worldwide head of research in the fields of allergy and respiratory diseases.

When he left Pfizer in 2011 Dr. Yeadon founded and led a biotech firm, Ziarco. Novartis acquired Ziaroco in 2017. See this.

An independent consultant to 30 biotech companies, Dr. Yeadon is currently Chief Scientific Adviser to America’s Frontline Doctors.

As the manufactured COVID crisis gathered momentum, Dr. Yeadon responded by engaging in constructive collaboration with professional colleagues. In February of 2021 Dr. Yeadon was part of a response made by Doctors for Covid Ethics. See this.

The D4CE initiative addressed the European Medicines Agency. The interveners charged that the agency was “premature and reckless” in granting the makers of COVID injections the European equivalent of Emergency Use Authorization.

Among the major issues that Dr. Yeadon and his colleagues raised was that the new medical products would almost certainly create major health deficits by stimulating “blood clots, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke.” See this.

The assertion by D4CE that these experimental injection products should be withdrawn from public distribution has been repeated many times by a wide variety of top-level scientific and professional groups. In the case of the COVD-19 power grab, however, the precautionary principle like so many other axiomatic rules of public health and public safety has simply been thrown to the wind in the warp speed rush to inflict widespread harm.

In the months that followed the intervention with the European Medicines Agency, Dr. Yeadon became increasingly convinced of the uselessness of appealing to corrupt regulatory agencies in the quest to protect the public from the dangerous medical products. The rot and corruption of these industry-captured regulatory bodies was simply too far advanced. The real project, he concluded, was to inflict massive medical harms with the intention of concentrating control over humanity in fewer and fewer hands.

His essays and interviews became more and more rooted in the well-backed thesis that the whole COVID drama was a high-level scam devoid of all honesty and benign intentions. In the course of developing this line of analysis, Dr. Yeadon authored a concise overview entitled “The Covid Lies.” See this.

In outlining his approach, Dr. Yeadon explained he had in 2020 “tried to find benign explanations” for the health care disaster underway but “failed to do so.” He determined that “the overall picture is one of extreme deception and highly organized fraud.” As he sees the COVID saga, “the entire event is based on lies.”

From Dr. Yeadon’s perspective, these lies are the outcome of “long-tern planning” meant to bring about “deliberately injurious acts” with “lethal consequences.” The whole methodology “gives a cloak of invisibility to those who want to commit mass murder, quite literally,” in an environment “where so many people are willing to imagine that it is not happening.”

Clearly Dr. Yeadon is not mincing his words in raising an alarm with enormous implications.

Dr. Yeadon sees at the end of this process the creation of a system of “vaccine passports” that are the gateway to a massive global system of mandatory digital IDs under the private proprietorship of a corporate leviathan. He continues,

“Add to this [power grab] a ‘financial great reset’ with the withdrawal of cash and introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and we have a wholly controlled population, controlled automatically without human intervention on the ground. All that is needed is to require the population to show their health passport or else they will not be allowed to cross a regulated threshold, like accessing a food store, or make a transaction using digital money unless the AI algorithms permit it.”

The largest part of Dr. Yeadon’s essay is composed of 12 subsections that identify and explain the nature of 12 COVID lies. Two of these lies involve what he calls “the central conceptual deceit” and the “central operational deceit.”

The operational deceit is the inaccurate system of PCR testing. This diagnostic procedure produces great abundances of false positive results that are deployed to inflate fear and justify the building up of a huge infrastructure of COVID operations.

For a time most of the world’s newspapers ran daily headlines calculated to push the public into panic because of “increased confirmed cases.” This fraudulent news was based on nothing more than the meaningless outcomes of a test whose inventor made it very clear that it was not made to diagnose disease. See this.

The chief conceptual deceit was the lie that COVID-19 was an elusive pathogen that could be prolifically spread by people not showing any symptoms of sickness. The lie of asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 opened the floodgates of fake PCR testing. It also opened the way to the global lockdowns that savaged the global economy and subjected humans to plagues of ailments like suicide, depression, domestic violence and substance abuse.

The Governments of Canada, the Netherlands and the WEF Team Up to Diminish Food Supplies and Promote Digital IDs as Conditions for Air Travel

The digital IDs and so-called vaccine passports that Dr. Yeadon warned against are being pushed forward in a wide variety of ways. For instance the World Bank has contributed $1 billion to fund “new cross-country vaccine passport frameworks.” See this.

The US approach to vaccine passports involves “a complex web of Big Tech partnerships.” See this.

One of the initiatives involves a collaborative project between the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Trudeau government in Canada and the Mark Ruffe government in the Netherlands. The trilateral cooperation between these parties is devoted to getting off the ground a pilot project named Known Traveller Digital Identity, KTDI. See this.

Many of those people who lined up to take the COVID jabs voluntarily did so in order to travel. This same constituency is being targeted again in the push to extend the COVID power grab into globalized Digital IDs.

The joint KTDI/WEF web site describes the initiative as “the first global collaboration of its kind,” one that “enables more secure and seamless travel.” It will do so by “enabling consortium partners to access verifiable claims of a traveller’s identity.”

One of the ways that the KTID partners say they will meet the objective of “cross-border data sharing and collaboration” is by embracing biometrics. Biometrics enable computerized systems of facial recognition that allow authorities “to link digital identity with the physical person.” See this.

The same trilateral partnership backing the KTDI initiative is also being put on international display in the growing resistance to the Dutch-Canadian-WEF plan to cut the use of nitrogen-emitting fertilizer by 30%. Those behind this cut justify the resulting diminishment of available food to adherence to the UN’s Agenda 2030 plan.

The concerted resistance of Dutch farmers to this attack on their economic viability has often been compared to the response of the Canadian Truckers’ Freedom Convoy to the repressive actions of the Trudeau government. Now the resistance movements of farmers in both the Netherlands and Canada are joining forces against similar attacks on food production being waged by their own WEF-indoctrinated governments.

See this.

Half of Justin Trudeau’s cabinet are political neophytes that have graduated from the WEF’s Young Leaders program. A document entitled “Introducing the Government of Canada’s Digital Ambition 2022” is very much in sync with the Great Reset agenda of the WEF. In it the Trudeau government lays out its ambitious plan for the next stages of the COVID-19 power grab into more sophisticated forms of spyware monitoring enabled by universalized standards in Digital IDs. See this.

The lengthy web post opens with the assertion, “Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadians have increasingly worked, shopped, learned, and engaged with government online.” The statement goes on to boast, “During the pandemic, the government quickly deployed new and innovative programs to support Canadians.”

This assertion veers away from much of what really happened. In fact the one-way stream of COVID communications from the Canadian government had little to do with “engagement” or “innovative programs.” Rather the top official in the Canadian government used the Internet to publicize his bitter personal attacks aimed at defaming, demonizing, segregating, threatening, and stripping from employment many Canadians who opted against taking the pathogenic clot shots.

The promised “consultation” on “Canada’s Digital Ambitions” will probably continue to marginalize and dismiss the views of any Canadians who do not share the same agendas as Canada’s WEF-indoctrinated government.

See this and this.

The KTID Digital ID scheme will no doubt be promoted as a way out of the chaos that has taken hold of the aviation industry. One of the most notorious international examples of this breakdown in the air travel business is Toronto’s Pearson International Airport. It operates within the federal jurisdiction of the Justin Trudeau government.

In the spring and summer of 2022 the Pearson Airport made many international headlines by being named “worst in the world” for flight delays and cancellations. The breakdown of the aviation system is closely connected to the imposition of injection mandates that caused thousands of aviation staff to exit their jobs.

The voluntary or coercive exit of masses of experienced airline employees fleeing their employers’ federally-empowered jab police, form the core element in the aviation industry’s very public breakdown. See this and this.

Those injection-compliant aviation workers who followed the mandates include fully-jabbed pilots. As recipients of the clot shots, the high-altitude working environment of the remaining pilots puts them at heightened risks of heart attacks, strokes, and such. See this.

Accordingly, those travellers who are able to make it into the air are being subjected to the added menace of aviation disasters caused by medical emergencies in the cockpit. See this and this.

The notorious mess at the Toronto Airport can be pictured as a reflection of Justin Trudeau’s incompetence. Trudeau manages to monkeypox practically every federal responsibility he touches.

Trudeau has been treating Canada’s busiest airport as a real life video game for his experiments in, for instance, random COVID testing, quarantining, and the mandatory imposition on all passengers of the QR coded ArriveCan Travel App. See this.

This ArriveCan app has been described as “a piece of glorified tracking technology with a record of what COVID vaccines you have received.” Basically it is a disguised vaccine passport ready to be folded into the infrastructure of the KTID project. See this.

Can We Restore a Rule of Law Together with a Decent and Reasonable Way of Living?

Christine Anderson, a Member of the European Parliament, recently chaired a meeting in Brussels on the chaos in air travel. In the assembly the contention was raised that “vaccinated pilots may no longer be fit to fly.”

The deteriorating state of the traumatized aviation industry is increasingly being regarded as a telling example of the deep malaise arising from the mass implementation of the COVID lies. Only now are the implications of putting aside precautionary principles in order to act on these misrepresentations, starting to be faced by a brave few in many discredited professions, institutions, and industries. See this and this.

The early stages of this stirring of self-reckoning within the airline business points the way to similar processes that must take place throughout society. We shall` not be able to restore anything like a viable rule of law, let alone decent and reasonable living conditions, without our coming to grips with the role of the COVID lies and COVID crimes in the ongoing COVID power grab.

In part 2 of this essay we shall explore more of the factors that caused Ms. Anderson to put the aviation fiasco in context. This fiasco is unfolding, she reflected, as one aspect in “the biggest crime ever committed in history on humanity.”

Subscribe to Global Research