Superior Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
I recently joined Bernadette Pajer and cohost Xavier on An Informed Life Radio to discuss how the public health establishment has been deceiving the public into believing that natural immunity to SARS‑CoV‑2, the coronavirus that causes COVID‑19, is insufficient and inferior to the immunity conferred by COVID‑19 vaccines.
Addressing each of the three main arguments used to support that claim, I set the record straight about what the science really tells us. Specific topics we discussed include:
-
- How the official ignorance of natural immunity illustrates how public vaccine policy is not about public health but about power, control, and profits for the pharmaceutical industry.
-
- How it is demonstrable that public health officials are deliberately lying about what science tells us about natural immunity.
-
- How the vaccine propaganda began while the vaccines were still under development with false claims in fearmongering media headlines that natural immunity wanes rapidly.
-
- How scientists propagating the message that antibodies equal immunity and therefore loss of circulating antibodies equals loss of immunity knew that this was false.
-
- How, with measles, the inferiority of vaccine conferred immunity and the loss of natural “exogenous boosting” has resulted in mothers today being less well able to convert passive maternal immunity to their babies.
-
- Why natural immunity must be considered an opportunity cost of vaccination.
-
- What “original antigenic sin” is and why everyone should be aware of the potential for this phenomenon before deciding to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
-
- How mass vaccination could actually impede the development of herd immunity.
-
- How mass vaccination could put evolutionary pressure on SARS-COV-2 resulting in the emergence of an “escape variant” (not unlike how the pertussis vaccine has resulted in the emergence of strains lacking a key antigen component of the vaccine).
-
- Why getting an annual flu shot might actually increase the risk of influenza illness in the long run.
-
- How in 1976 public health authorities warned of an influenza pandemic and pushed a mass vaccination campaign, but no pandemic occurred, and the vaccine was shown to cause Guillain Barre Syndrome, a polio-like paralytic disease.
-
- How the 2009 pandemic influenza vaccine in Europe was found to cause narcolepsy, another autoimmune disease.
-
- How studies have found that pre-existing cross-protective T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2 from prior infection with coronaviruses that cause the common cold.
-
- How the media cherry pick studies to propagate the most alarmist fearmongering headlines.
-
- How the public health establishment and media have propagated the claim that more antibodies equal better immunity, even though a high level of antibodies is actually associated with more severe COVID-19 (independently from age).
-
- How antibodies are neither sufficient not even necessary for immunity to SARS-CoV-2 (just as with measles).
-
- How the public health establishment has propagated the claim that vaccines offer better protection against variants based on studies that completely ignore the role of cellular immunity as well as immunologic memory.
-
- How the CDC lies by omission by persisting in saying that people who’ve recovered from infection still need to get vaccinated because scientists don’t know how long natural immunity lasts, withholding the fact that studies have shown that infection induces recognized markers of very long-lived immunologic memory.
-
- How some studies have shown that vaccination can have a detrimental effect for people with pre-existing natural immunity, through what is sometimes called “immune exhaustion”.
-
- How the scientific community knows that the CDC is deceiving the public, yet most scientists are either silent or complicit in the big lie, illustrating the thorough corruption of science from government involvement in “public health”.
-
- What “antibody dependent enhancement” is and why it remains a concern for COVID-19 vaccines.
-
- How, to support its policies, the CDC cites studies that either don’t support or directly contradict its claims.
Subscribe to Jeremy R. Hammond
Subscribe
Login
0 Comments
Newest