The plan to push more injections, target OB/GYNs, and to track whom, among the pregnant, are getting injected
by Jessica Rose | Jul 27, 2022
So I got another couple of documents in my inbox this afternoon. The one I wish to ‘write up’ here is entitled: “Title: Surveys to Monitor Vaccination Coverage (Influenza, Tdap, and other vaccines) among Pregnant Women during the 2022-23 Influenza Season”. This is a competitive procurement to find the best person for the job to help the CDC spy on pregnant women with regard to who’s getting injected with what so that they can get more and more pregnant women injected. Maybe this is just ‘something that the CDC do’, but to me, this kind of information is still no one’s bloody business by the individual’s, and the person recommending whatever treatment/injection that individual might receive.
ACIP, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Nurse Midwives, and the American Academy of Family Physicians recommend that all pregnant women be vaccinated for influenza during any trimester of pregnancy. However, prior to the 2009-10 influenza season, influenza vaccination among pregnant women assessed in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) was below 30% (9-10). (Smart women.) During the 2009-10 season, vaccination coverage increased to 32%-47%, depending on the source of the estimate (10-12). Vaccination coverage among pregnant women has not increased appreciably since the 2009-10 season. (Awww.) The most recent coverage estimate available from the 2020-21 season indicated that 54.5% of pregnant women were vaccinated.
Here’s the kicker for me and shows the cold, calculated horror behind why so many women now have vaccine-injured children, for example.
Prior studies have shown that a recommendation for vaccination by a health care provider is strongly associated with influenza vaccination among pregnant women. Extensive vaccination campaigns and outreach efforts have been conducted targeting OB/GYN or other providers caring for pregnant women to emphasize their role in assuring their pregnant patients get vaccinated.
OB/GYNs and pediatricians are targeted by drug pushers. The CDC is working for the pharmaceutical companies. Their business model requires maximizing profit. Tell the OB/GYNs to push injections onto pregnant women. More product used, more profit. Great!
The OB/GYNs are not questioning the ‘recommendations’ of the CDC, and in some cases, are pushing the concept of injection of everyone. They think it is safe to do so, and they think they’re saving lives. Pregnant or not! They are targeted to do so and they are told what to think. Why would they question ‘the authority’? It’s not like they are working for the pharmaceutical companies. Oh, wait. Yes they are. Whoopsie. See the problem? How about we accompany these drug pushers with some literature explaining the risks that accompany these injections as well, shall we?
Now the above information may not come as a surprise to you, but to see it simply written down like this to me, is proof of the usurping of the medical profession to push drugs like pimps instead of pushing healthy diet and exercise.
COVID-19 is a respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, a new coronavirus discovered in 2019. (No, it’s not.) The virus is thought to spread mainly from person to person through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks. Pregnant people (WOMEN: PREGNANT WOMEN, for Christ’s sake) with COVID-19 have an increased risk for illness resulting in intensive care admission, mechanical ventilation or death. (Really? Where are the studies that show this?) Additionally, they may be at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth. (Oh yeah, have you see the still birth rates across the globe associated with COVID-19 shots?) In December 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued Emergency Use Authorizations for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines to prevent COVID-19 in persons aged 16 or 18 years and older, respectively. (Yeah, they did this even though the ‘safety’ data showed harm and in the face of effective treatments.) On August 11, 2021, CDC streghtened its recommendations and recommends COVID-19 vacciantion for people who are pregnant, lactating, currently trying to get pregnant, or who might become pregnant in the near future.
I realize that this is a ‘competitive procurement’, but why are there so many typos? I personally have a rule about that: too many typos, not a serious document.
I can’t count the ways in which this is malfeasant. There’s no data to support any claim of safety of these shots in pregnant, planning-to-be-pregnant or breast-feeding women. None. I have given 2 presentations recently on this subject matter and I would be pleased to share.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
The fact that they are planning nation-wide CDC-funded surveillance, and looking for the ‘right people’ to make these surveys, is disturbing to me. It wouldn’t have been 2.5 years ago, but it is now.
Aldén M, Olofsson Falla F, Yang D, et al. Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;44(3):1115-1126. Published 2022 Feb 25. doi:10.3390/cimb44030073.
Jachowicz JW, Bing X, Pontabry J, Bošković A, Rando OJ, Torres-Padilla ME. LINE-1 activation after fertilization regulates global chromatin accessibility in the early mouse embryo. Nat Genet. 2017;49(10):1502-1510. doi:10.1038/ng.3945.
Luongo, F.P.; Dragoni, F.; Boccuto, A.; Paccagnini, E.; Gentile, M.; Canosi, T.; Morgante, G.; Luddi, A.; Zazzi, M.; Vicenti, I.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Ovarian Cells: A Potential Negative Impact on Female Fertility. Cells 2022, 11, 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ cells11091431.
Lee et al., Investigating trends in those who experience menstrual bleeding changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. SCIENCE ADVANCES. 15 Jul 2022. Vol 8, Issue 28. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm7201.
Dotan A, Kanduc D, Muller S, Makatsariya A, Shoenfeld Y. Molecular mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 and the female reproductive system. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021;86(6):e13494. doi:10.1111/aji.13494.
Yan X, Wang L ,Yan C ,et al. Decreased expression of the vitamin D receptor in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Arch Biochem Bio-phys. 2016;606:128-133.
Lessans N, Rottenstreich A, Stern S, et al. The effect of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine on menstrual cycle symptoms in healthy women [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jul 20]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;10.1002/ijgo.14356. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14356.
Gat I, Kedem A, Dviri M, et al. Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors [published online ahead of print, 2022 Jun 17]. Andrology. 2022;10.1111/andr.13209. doi:10.1111/andr.13209.
© 2023 FM Media Enterprises, Ltd.